**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**
Website: www.DrErnestGarlingtonFightsForJustice.com
Email: collegevprison@gmail.com
CT Inmate, Dr. Ernest C. Garlington,
Requesting Unbiased Legal Representation
Following Testimony that
Sentencing Judge’s Wife Intimidated His Attorney
CONNECTICUT – Dr. Ernest C. Garlington is currently incarcerated at the MacDougall Walker Correctional Institution located
in Suffield, Connecticut. He was sentenced to a term of 33 years following a highly publicized criminal trial in 2007. The
frenzied media coverage was based on the charge that Dr. Garlington conspired to murder the step-father of Boston Celtics
guard, and former UCONN hero, Ray Allen.
Beyond his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, he raises serious issues as to the fundamental legitimacy of the original
trial – the partiality of the trial judge, the insufficiency of the evidence, police misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, judicial
misconduct as well as conspiracy, obstruction of justice, fraud and coercion on the part of the presiding judge, his wife and the
prosecutor.
The CT Public Defender’s Office has assigned three different attorneys to Dr. Garlington's habeas case over the past 3-1/2
years. None of these attorneys have been willing to expose the corruption in this case to defend Garlington’s innocence, due to
conspiracy, coercion, threats and manipulation. The habeas case has been stalled because these Public Defender attorneys
have withdrawn from the case, forcing Dr. Garlington to sit behind bars. The CT Public Defender’s Office has effectively
revoked Dr. Garlington’s constitutional right to a habeas trial.
In his obstructed efforts to file a writ of habeas corpus, Dr. Garlington's Federal Civil Rights have been violated. He has
repeatedly been denied his constitutional right to fair, unbiased, effective assistance of counsel. Thus far, two public defenders
have applied for, and received permission to withdraw from Dr. Ernest Garlington's case due to concern of retaliation from
Judge Patrick Clifford, the original presiding judge. The third public defender was requested to withdraw because he will be
called as a witness during the habeas case.
March 2008: Following the trial, Garlington hired the law firm of Denner & Pellegrino (Boston, MA). Attorney Jeff Denner was
informed by Dr. Garlington that he overheard a Court Marshall say that Judge Clifford’s wife, a realtor, was going to sell Ray
Allen an $8M home, with a sizeable commission. Garlington also explained that Clifford mentioned something about the home,
but when he asked his attorney, Willie Dow, about it, Attorney Dow said it was nothing and he did not know anything about it.
Attorney Denner checked the transcripts and discovered there was no mention of an $8 million dollar real-estate deal, so he
ordered the tapes of the trial. The incriminating discussion, which included the presiding judge stating: "We need money. We've
got my daughter's wedding to pay for. My wife better start shaking the money tree," was revealed on the tapes and the court was
ordered to revise the transcript by including the $8.7M real estate deal. [CR9-173818] Attorney Denner stated: “In my 25
years of practice, I’ve never heard anything like this in open court. Judge Clifford is the poster child for Judicial Misconduct because Judge Clifford had been rebuked previously by the court for having outrageous conversations in open court.” [Taken from
transcripts during jury selection on 10/23/2007 and 10/24. The court and the defense attorneys have a copy of the
taped conversation and it is public record.]
The Garlington Family made a formal complaint to the Judicial Review Committee regarding the incriminating discussion
caught on tape about the $8.7M real estate scandal. The complaint was ignored. Dr. Garlington, from his prison cell, discovered
that documents presented as evidence from the investigation of the real estate scandal contained fraudulent signatures.
Garlington received results from an independent Signature Examination report on December 8, 2010. [Report available upon
request] The results confirmed, with absolute certainty, that Judge Clifford’s wife, Susan Clifford, forged the signatures of
Daniel and Diane Dolan [the homeowners and friends of Judge Clifford) to cover-up the quarter of a million dollars she would
have received in commission if she had sold the $8.7MM mansion to the alleged victim’s step-son, Ray Allen, before or after the
trial. Garlington submitted his findings to the Judicial Review Committee.
2011: Attorney Bruce McIntyre withdrew from Dr. Garlington's case after only 3 months. He has represented numerous
clients before Judge Patrick Clifford, as well as been appointed, directly by Judge Clifford, to represent a client in a 2011 case.
2013: Attorney Ted Koch requested to withdraw from representing Dr. Garlington [Superior Court, Judicial District of
Tolland, Dated January 10, 2013 - Docket #124004333-S], citing concern about his present/future relationship with Judge
Patrick Clifford. In court transcripts he is quoted as saying: "I want to say up front, that my reason for withdrawing from [Dr.
Garlington's case] is not personal to Dr. Garlington. We have an amicable relationship. He's not being unreasonable, and he's not
being crazy." Also: ". . . without going into details, Mr. Garlington has some claims against Judge Clifford that there's some basis
for, as far as I can tell, and that would be quite powerful claims to make. So, it's essentially a conflict of interest question."
November 13, 2015: Dr. Garlington's third public defender, Attorney David DeRosa, sought to withdraw from Dr. Garlington's
case [Docket 124004333-S] at the request of Dr. Garlington. The failure of current counsel, Attorney David DeRosa from the
Division of Public Defender Services, to report to the Division of Public Defender Services and the Statewide Bar Counsel
Grievance Committee Attorney Koch’s actions in this matter, creates a further conflict of interest with the Division of Public
Defender Services and any attorneys affiliated with said Division.
As per court instruction, Attorney DeRosa met with Attorney Koch to provide background on the habeas case. Attorney
DeRosa stated: "Mr. Koch said the case just got crazy. People calling me and everything else and I just had to withdraw."
Attorney DeRosa additionally stated in court that "Susan Clifford [Judge Clifford's wife] contacted Attorney Koch regarding Dr.
Garlington's case." These allegations of judicial misconduct are further enhanced by Attorney Koch's statement to Attorney
DeRosa that Judge Clifford himself pressured Attorney Theodore Koch Sr. (father of Attorney Koch) to encourage his son to
withdraw from representation of Dr. Garlington. The presiding judge (William H Bright, Jr.) responded: "I can understand why
Mr. Garlington would conclude that the only reason that Judge Clifford's wife would be calling Attorney Koch would be to pressure
him about the case. That's a reasonable inference for him to draw." Dr. Garlington explained to Judge Bright that "Susan Clifford
knows that her falsified signature is going to become a part of this habeas," at which time the Judge asked Attorney DeRosa: "Are
you prepared to, if you need to, put Judge Clifford's wife on the stand and question her about this alleged fraud and the
conversation with Attorney Koch?" To which Attorney DeRosa responded: "Sure, Your Honor."
Dr. Garlington plans on calling Attorney McIntyre, Attorney Koch and Attorney DeRosa to testify regarding the coercion,
intimidation and fraud being perpetrated on his right to fair, unbiased, effective counsel.
In short, in an effort to avoid exposure of criminal acts which occurred during the original trial, officers of the court have
coerced and bullied the Public Defenders Services to effectively revoke Dr. Garlington’s Constitutional rights to a fair and
impartial habeas trial, thereby violating his Federal Civil Rights. Dr. Garlington simply seeks the opportunity to prove his
innocence.
